تقديم أولي :مصادر ومراجع مهمة في تحضير مقياس تحليل السياسة الخارجية لطلبة الليسانس السنة الثالثة علاقات دولية

تقديم أولي :مصادر ومراجع مهمة في تحضير مقياس تحليل السياسة الخارجية لطلبة الليسانس السنة الثالثة علاقات دولية

by miloud ould seddik -
Number of replies: 0

تقديم أولي:

   من خلال اشرافنا على تدريس مقياس تحليل السياسة الخارجية وبالإطلاع على  القراءات في مناهج الجامعات والمؤسسات الأكاديمية التي تدرس المقياس او مقاييس مشابهة له نقوم  قبل نشر المحاضرات المقررة بتقديم جملة المصادر والمراجع العلمية المتخصصة  التي نرى انها تصلح لأن يستقي منها الطالب والأستاذ معا المادة العلمية اللازمة التي تمكن من الاطلاع اكثر على فحوى وجوهر السياسة الخارجية :

 

الـمـراجــــع:

* الكـتـب باللغة العربية :

1- بهجت قرني وعلي الدين هلال، السياسة الخارجية للدول العربية، مركز البحوث والدراسات السياسية، 1994.

2- زايد عبد الله مصباح: "السياسة الخارجية"، طرابلس، ليبيا: جامعة الفاتح.

3- حسين شريف: "السياسة الخارجية الأمريكية فى السبعينيات والثمانينيات من خلال رؤى وتحركات نيكسون-كيسنجر"، القاهرة: الهيئة المصرية العامة للكتاب، سلسلة مكتبة الأسرة،  2005.

4- فاضل زكي محمد، السياسة الخارجية: وأبعادها في السياسة الدولية، جامعة بغداد، 1994.

5- لويد جنسن، تفسير السياسة الخارجية، ترجمة د. محمد بن أحمد مفتى، جامعة الملك سعود، عمادة شؤون المكتبات، الطبعة الأولى، 1989.ص ص. 98-102

6- محمد السيد سليم، تحليل السياسة الخارجية، القاهرة: مركز البحوث والدراسات السياسية، 1989.

7- ____________  "تحليل السياسة الخارجية"، القاهرة: مكتبة النهضة المصرية، الطبعة الثانية، 1998

8- ناصيف يوسف حتى، النظرية في العلاقات الدولية، دار الكتاب العربي، 1985.

* الدوريات العربية

     - مجموعة مقالات من مجلات " المستقبل العربى، السياسة الدولية، وشؤون عربية".

*  الكتب باللغة  الإنجليزية  :

 

1)    V.M. Hudson (2005) Foreign Policy Analysis: Actor- Specific Theory and the Ground of International Relations” Foreign Policy Analysis:

2)    D.Frei and D.Ruloff (1989) Handbook of Foreign Policy Analysis.

3)    R.W. Mansbach (2000) Global Puzzle : Issues and Actors in a World Politics. ch.6 (The Janus Faces of Foreign Policy).

4)    V.M. Hudson and C.S. Vore (1995) “Foreign Policy Analysis Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow “ Mershon International Studies Reviews p.102.

5)    G. J. Ikenberry ,et al.(1988) “Introduction: approaches to explaining American foreign economic policy” International Organization.

6)    -     S. Woolcock (2004) “State and Non-State Actors” in N. Bayne and S. Woolcock eds. The New Economic Diplomacy (Ashgate): 45-64 .

7)    -     J.D. Hagen (1995) “Domestic Political Explanations in the Analysis of Foreign Policy” in L. Neack, et al., eds. Foreign Policy Analysis.

8)    D.S. Papp (1994) Contemporary International Relations. ch.6

9)    A. George (1993) Bridging the Gap: Theory and Practice in Foreign Polocy. Ch.2

10)  -     B. Hogwood and L. Gunn (1984) Policy Analysis for the Real World..

11)  -     C. Patton and D. Suwicki (1984) Basic Methods of Policy Analysis and Planning ch. 6 (Identifying Alternatives)

12)  R. N. Hass (2005) “Regime Change and Its Limit” Foreign Affairs Vol 84 No 4 :66-78.

13)  - S. Smith and M.Clarke (1985) Foreign Policy Implementation ch.1, 6

14)  -    G.R. Berridge (2002) Diplomacy: Theory and Practice. ch.2-

15)  -   G. Raymond (1987) “Evaluation: A Neglected Task for the Comparative Study of Foreign Policy” in C. Hermann, et al.(eds.) New Paradigm in the Study of Foreign Policy.

16)  - Gerner, D. 1991. ‘Foreign policy analysis: renaissance, routine or rubbish?’ in W. Crotty, ed.,Political Science: Looking to the Future, Evanston: Northwestern University Press, pp. 123-185.

17)  - Gerner, D. 1995. ‘The evolution of the study of foreign policy,’ in L. Neack, J. Hey and P. Haney,eds. Foreign Policy Analysis

18)  - Hermann, C. 1978. ‘Foreign policy behavior: That which is to be explained,’ in M. East, S.Salmore and C. Hermann, eds. Why Nations Act, Beverly Hills: Sage.

19)  - Hermann, C. and G. Peacock. 1987. ‘The evolution and future of theoretical research in thecomparative study of foreign policy,’ in C. Hermann, C. Kegley, Jr., and J. Rosenau, eds., New Directions in the Study of Foreign Policy, Boston: Allen & Unwin.

20)  - Hudson, V. 2005. ‘Foreign policy analysis: Actor-specific theory and the ground of international relations’, Foreign Policy Analysis 1: 1-30.

21)  - Light, M. 1994. 'Foreign policy analysis,' in A. Groom and M. Light, eds., Contemporary International Relations: A Guide to Theory, London: Pinter, pp. 93-108.

22)  -Meehan, E. 1971. ‘The concept foreign policy,’ in W. Hanreider, ed., Comparative Foreign Policy, New York: David McKay, pp. 351-363.

23)  - Rosenau, J. 1968. ‘Introductory note to The actions of States,’ in Rosenau, ed., International Politics and Foreign Policy: A Reader in Research and Theory, New York: The Free Press.

24)  - Rosenau, J. 1968. ‘Comparative foreign policy: Fad, fantasy or field?’ International Studies Quarterly 12: 296-329.

25)  - Brecher, M., B. Steinberg, and J. Stein. 1969. ‘A framework for research on foreign policy behavior,’ Journal of Conflict Resolution 13: 75-101. [skim]

26)  -Carlsnaes, W. 1992. ‘The agent-structure problem in foreign policy analysis,’ International Studies Quarterly 36: 245-270.

27)  - Singer, J.D. 1961. ‘The level-of-analysis problem in international politics,’ World Politics 14:77-92.

28)  - Waever, O. 1994. ‘Resisting the temptation of Post Foreign Policy Analysis’, in Walter Carlsnaes& Steve Smith (eds.), European Foreign Policy: The EC and Changing Perspectives in Europe, Beverley Hills: Sage, pp. 238-273.

29)  - Jervis, R. 1976. ‘Perception and Level of Analysis problem,’ chap 1 in Perception and Misperception in International Relations, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

30)  - Rosenau, J. 1966. ‘Pre-theories and theories of foreign policy’, in J. Charlesworth, ed.

31)  - Approaches to Comparative and International Politics, New York: Free Press, pp. 115-169.

32)  - Rosenau, J. 1980. The Scientific Study of Foreign Policy, London: Frances Pinter.

33)  - Rosenau, J. 1984. ‘Pre-theory revisited,’ International Studies Quarterly 28: 245-306.

34)  - Snyder, R.C., H.W. Bruck, and B. Sapin. 1962. Decision making as an Approach to the Study of International Politics, Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp.15-74.

35)  - Wolfers, A. 1962. ‘The actors in international politics,’ in Discord and Collaboration, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

36)  -Smith, S. and M. Hollis. 1992. ‘Structure and Action: Further Comments' Review of International Studies, 18: 187-188.

37)  -Welch, D. 1992. ‘The organizational process and bureaucratic politics paradigms,’ International Security 17: 112-146.

38)  Stern, E., et al. 1998. ‘Whither the study of governmental politics in foreign policymaking: a symposium,’ Mershon International Studies Review 42: 205-55.

39)  -Krasner, S. 1971. ‘Are bureaucracies important? (Or Allison Wonderland)’, Foreign Policy 7:159-179.

40)  -Allison, G. and M. Halperin. (1972) ‘Bureaucratic politics: a paradigm and some policy implications,’ World Politics 24: 40-79.

41)  -Bender, J. and T. Hammond. 1992. ‘Rethinking Allison’s Models’, American Political Science Review 86: 301-322.

42)  -Halperin, M. 1974. Bureaucratic politics and foreign policy, Washington: Brookings.

43)  -Levy, J. 1986. ‘Organizational processes and the causes of war,’ International Studies Quarterly 30: 193-222.

44)  -March, J. 1997. 'Understanding how decisions happen in organizations,' in Z. Shapira, ed.

45)  -Organizational Decision Making Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 9-33.

46)  -March, J. and J. Olsen. 1984. 'The new institutionalism: organizational factors in political life,'American Political Science Review : 734-749.

47)  -Hermann, M. 1980. ‘Explaining foreign policy behaviour using the personal characteristics of political leaders,’ International Studies Quarterly 24: 7-46.

48)  -Walker, S. 1977. 'The interface between beliefs and behavior: Henry Kissinger's operational code and the Vietnam War,' Journal of Conflict Resolution 21: 129-168.

49)  -Young, M. and M. Schafer. 1998. 'Is there method in our madness: Ways of assessing cognition in international relations,' Mershon International Studies Review 42: 63-96.

50)  -Levy, J. 1997. ‘Prospect theory, rational choice and international relations,’ International Studies Quarterly 41: 87-112.

51)  -Axelrod, R., ed. 1976. Structure of Decision: The Cognitive Maps of Political Elites, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

52)  -Cottam, M. 1986. Foreign Policy Decision Making: The Influence of Cognition, Boulder: Westview Press.

53)  -George, A. 1969. ‘The operational code: a neglected approach to the study of political leaders and decision-making,’ International Studies Quarterly 13: 190-222.

54)  -Holsti, O. 1970. 'The "Operational Code" Approach to the Study of Political Leaders: John Foster Dulles' Philosophical and Instrumental Beliefs,' Canadian Journal of Political Science 3: 123-57.

55)  -Jervis, R. 1976. Perception and Misperception in International Politics, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

56)  -Jones, B. 1999. 'Bounded rationality,' Annual Review of Political Science, 2: 297-321.

57)  -Larson, D. 1985. Origins of Containment: A Psychological Explanation.

        Princeton: Princeton University Press.

58)  -Mintz, Alex. 2004. ‘How do leaders make decisions? A polyheuristic perspective’, Journal of Conflict Resolution 48: 3-13.

59)  -Ripley, B. 1993. ‘Psychology, foreign policy and international relations theory,’ Political Psychology 14: 403-416.

60)  -Levy, J. 2003. 'Political Psychology and Foreign Policy,' in D. Sears, L. Huddy, and R. Jervis,eds., Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 253-84.

61)  -Larson, D. 1994. ‘The role of belief systems and schemas in foreign policy decision-making,’Political Psychology 15: 17-33.

62)  -McLean, J. 1988. ‘Belief systems and ideology’, in S. Smith and R. Little, eds., Belief Systems and the Study of International Relations, Oxford: Blackwell.

63)  -Goldstein, J. and R. Keohane (eds.). 1993. Ideas and Foreign Policy: Beliefs, Institutions and Political Change, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

64)  -Hudson, V., ed. 1997. Culture and Foreign Policy. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.

65)  -Hudson, V. and M. Sampson. 1999. 'Culture and Foreign Policy Analysis.' Special Issue, Political Psychology, 20: 667-896.

66)  -Sylvan, D., C. Ostrom, and Gannon. 1994. ‘Case-based, model-based, and explanation-based styles of reasoning in foreign policy,’ International Studies Quarterly 38: 61-90.

67)  -Vertberger, Y. 1986. ‘Foreign policy decision-makers as practical-intuitive historians: applied history and its shortcomings,’ International Studies Quarterly 30: 223-247.

68)  -Vertzberger, Y. 1993. The World in their Minds: Information Processing, Cognition, and Perception in Foreign Policy Decision making . Stanford: Stanford University Press.

69)  -Garrison, J. 2003. ‘Foreign policymaking and group dynamics: where we’ve been and where we’re going’, International Studies Review 5: 177-183.

70)  -t’Hart, P. 1991. ‘Irving Janis’ victims of groupthink,’ Political Psychology 12: 247-278.

71)  -Hermann, M. 2001. ‘How decision units shape foreign policy: a theoretical framework’,

72)  -Preston, T. and P. t’Hart. 1999. ‘Understanding and evaluating bureaucratic politics: the nexus between political leaders and advisory systems’, Political Psychology 20: 49-98.

73)  -Beasley, R. 1998. 'Collective interpretations: How problem representations aggregate in foreign policy groups,' in D. Sylvan and J. Voss, eds. Problem representation in foreign policy decision making, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 80-115.

74)  -Beasley, R., et al., 2001. ‘People and processes in foreign policymaking: insights from comparative case studies’, International Studies Review 217-250.

75)  't Hart, P., E. Stern, and B. Sundelius. 1997. 'Foreign policy-making at the top: political group dynamics,' in 't Hart, P., E. Stern, and B. Sundelius, eds. Beyond Groupthink, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

76)  -t'Hart, P. 1990. Groupthink in Government: A Study of Small Groups and Policy Failure. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

77)  -Hermann, M. and C. Hermann. 1989. ‘Who makes foreign policy decisions and how: an empirical inquiry,’ International Studies Quarterly 33: 361-387.

78)  -Janis, I. 1982. Groupthink, rev. ed., Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

79)  -Kaarbo, J. 1998. 'Power politics in foreign policy: The influence of bureaucratic minorities,'European Journal of International Relations 4: 67-97.

80)  -Kegley, C. 1987. 'Decision regimes and the comparative study of foreign policy,' in C. Hermann,C. Kegley, and J. Rosenau, eds. New Directions in the Study of Foreign Policy, Boston: Allenand Unwin, pp. 247-268.

81)  -Kowert, P. 2002. Groupthink or Deadlock: When Do Leaders Learn from Their Advisors Albany: State University of New York Press.

82)  -Verbeek, B. 2003. Decision-Making in Great Britain During the Suez Crisis: Small Groups and a Persistent Leader. Burlington: Ashgate, 2003.

83)  -Anderson, P.A. 1987. ‘What do decision makers do when they make a foreign policy decision?’,in C. Hermann et al., eds. New Directions in the Study of Foreign Policy, Boston: Allen and Unwin.

84)  -Carlsnaes, Walter, "The Agency-Structure Problem in Foreign Policy Analysis," International Studies Quarterly 36 (1992), pp. 245-270.

85)  -Smout, Marie-Claude, "What is there to foreign policy?", In Foreign Policy today, Powers, No. 88, January 1999, pp. 5-15.

86)  -Ole R. Holsti, "Public Opinion and Foreign Policy: Challenges to the Almond- Lipmann Consensus," International Studies Quarterly, 36 (4), December1992:439-66.

 

87)  -Andrews, B. 1975. 'Social rules and the state as a social actor,' World Politics 27: 521-540.

88)  -Barnett, M. 1999. 'The politics of indifference at the United Nations: The security council, peacekeeping and genocide in Rwanda,' in J. Weldes, et al., eds. Cultures of Insecurity

89)  -Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, [skim; focus on first part]

90)  -Milliken, J. 1995. ‘State action in IR: A critique,’ Unpublished manuscript, Graduate Institute of

91)  -International Studies, Geneva.

92)  -Shapiro, M., G. Bonham and D. Heradstveit. 1988. 'A discursive practices approach to collective decision-making,' International Studies Quarterly 32: 397-419.

93)  -Beer, F. and G. Boynton. 1996. ‘Realistic rhetoric but not realism: a senatorial conversation on

94)  -Cambodia,’ in F. Beer and R. Hariman, eds., Post-Realism: the rhetorical turn in international relations, East Lansing: Michigan State University Press, pp. 369-383.

95)  -Fischer, F. 2003. Reframing Public Policy: Discursive Politics and Deliberative Practices Oxford.

96)  -Hopf, T. 2002. Social Construction of International Politics: Identities & Foreign  Policies.

97)  -Policies, Moscow, 1955 & 1999. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

98)  -Milliken, J. and D. Sylvan. 1996. 'Soft Bodies, Hard Targets, and Chic Theories.

99)  -Sylvan, D. and H. Alker, Jr. 1988. 'Foreign Policy as Tragedy: Sending 100,000 Troops to Vietnam,' Unpublished manuscript [available from ML]

100) -Sylvan, D. and S. Majeski. 1996. ‘Rhetorics of place characteristics in high-level U.S. foreign policy making,’ in F. Beer and R. Hariman, eds., Post-Realism: the rhetorical turn in international relations, East Lansing: Michigan State University Press, pp. 309-329.

101) Weldes, J. 1996. ‘Constructing national interests,’ European Journal of International Relations, 2:275-318.

102) - Discussion questions: What are the implications of adopting a post-positivist understanding of foreign policy as discourse?

 

103) -Ashley, R. 1987. 'Foreign policy as political performance,' International Studies Notes 13: 51-54.

104) -Doty. R. 1993. ‘Foreign policy as social construction: A post-positivist analysis of U.S.

105) Counterinsurgency policy in the Philippines,’ International Studies Quarterly 37(2): 297-320.

106) Milliken, J. 1999. 'The study of discourse in international relations: a critique of research and methods,' European Journal of International Relations 5: 225-254.

107) O’Tuathail, G. 2002. ‘Theorizing practical geopolitical reasoning: the case of the United States’ response to the war in Bosnia,’ Political Geography 21: 601-628

108) -Rumelili, B. 2004. 'Constructing identity and relating to difference: understanding the EU's mode of differentiation,' Review of International Studies 30.

109)  -Waever, O. 2002. ‘Identities, communities and foreign policy: Discourse analysis as foreign policy theory’, in L. Hansen and O. Waever, eds. National Integration and National Identity (London: Routledge), pp. 20-49

 

*   مختارات من "مجلة السياسة الخارجية/ Foreign Policy

- "The War Over the Iraq War"

- "Seven Questions: The Future of oil", Posted Sept. 2005.

- "Think Again: Nuclear Energy", Posted Sept. 2005.

- "The List: Sizing up Iran's Military", Posted May 1, 2006.

- "Al-Qaeda Faces an Ideological Crisis", The Daily Star, May 6, 006.

- "The War Over Israel's Influence", July/August 2006.